Snooki of "Jersey Shore" and Suzy Menkes of the International Herald Tribune. Photos MTV/Scott Gries | Getty Images

Normally, designers and celebrities go together like champagne and bubbles. Famous faces in the front row of the collections mean more publicity which hopefully translates into more sales in the stores.

But America's current fascination with the self-described "Guido" cast of the MTV hit "Jersey Shore" is causing some consternation ahead of New York Fashion Week.

The trouble-magnet known as Snooki has, through an intermediary, let it be known that she is available to be a celebrity guest at the shows, which is wrinkling noses on faces normally too Botoxed to move.

"It's a nightmare," one veteran fashion publicist, who is responsible for seating several top Fashion Week shows, told me. "Nobody wants any of those kids anywhere near their brand."

The problem is that while the "Jersey Shore" cast would certainly attract flashbulbs, their lowbrow image is not seen as a snug fit with the showcase event of a multibillion-dollar luxury industry. Or, in the words of another Fashion Week vet: "They're [bleeping] peasants."

Of course, it would not be hard to re-cast the "Jersey Shore" team with talent already familiar to Fashion Week. International Herald Tribune critic Suzy Menkes is an obvious choice for Snooki, based on their similar hair styles. J-Woww and Betsey Johnson also look as if they share a hairdresser.

For his famous abs, The Situation could only be played by Marc Jacobs, who has shown a recent fondness for stripping down for the camera. And the musclebound Ronnie looks like he shares a gym routine with square-shouldered menswear maestro, John Bartlett.

Sammi Sweetheart and Donna Karan show a similar knack for staying centered as madness swirls around them, while the bashful good-guy Vinny reminds me of gentlemanly designer Michael Bastian. DJ Pauly D could only be fashion's favorite spin-meister, Ben Cho.

Then there's Angelina, the cast member who seemed promising but was fired early on and completely disappeared from the scene. Umm, Kate Betts?

However, you can expect to see reality stars the Kardashians at Fashion Week showing their collection for Bebe.

Anne Hathaway raises the roof (and some eyebrows) with new British GQ cover.

Getting overly Photoshopped? Now that's the pits.

Anne Hathaway's sexy new cover for British GQ's March issue is causing speculation that the actress' armpits have been airbrushed away, Jezebel reports.

The cover, on stands now, features the "Valentine's Day" star nearly popping out of her provocative black corset as she raises her arms above her head.

Only problem? Her left armpit appears to be MIA, with nary a hollow to be seen. An interior shot of the actress in a retro bra and shorts set also casts her underarms in an unrealistic light.

Maybe it's her deodorant?

Of course, this wouldn't be the first time a celebrity is the victim to Photoshop gone awry. Demi Moore's hip reportedly got the chop on the cover of W, only to resurface on the magazine's Korean edition.

And let's not forget the major kerfuffle ignited by Ralph Lauren's you've-got-to-be-kidding-me airbrush treatment of a stick-thin model.

So, is Hathaway a genetic mutant, or did someone in the art department get a little Photoshop-happy while retouching underarm stubble? You be the judge.

Not all celebs get airbrushed. Check out Sadie Frost's nude, unretouched shoot for Grazia.

This bag will be stuffed with goodies just for you!

• To enter, leave a confirmed comment below telling us who your favorite designer is.
• The comment must be left before 5 pm ET on February 11, 2010.
• You may enter only once. 3 winners will be selected in a random drawing.
• 3 winners will receive one gift bag each (contents valued at $1400)
• Open to legal residents of the 50 United States, the District of Columbia and Canada (excluding Quebec) who are 18 and older.
• Click here for complete official rules.